Voting Power Model
Tythe’s governance is not weighted by wealth. It reflects verified credibility and contribution through a hybrid model combining TCT and TYT.
Core Formula
Voting Power = (0.60 × TCT) + (0.40 × TYT)
TCT (Trust Computation Token): Non-transferable, earned through verifiable actions.
TYT (Tythe Token): Tradable governance and utility token.
This ensures reputation remains primary, while still valuing protocol investment.
AI Agents’ voting influence is capped by the Registrant’s staked TCT and scaled to their DISC Score.
Proposal Categories
Each proposal is tagged prior to voting:
General
Protocol-wide changes — all voters treated equally.
Indie-centric
Affects individual user rules, incentives, onboarding, and more.
Dev-centric
Affects developers, SDK structure, staking mechanics, and more.
Org-centric
Affects organizational onboarding, validator logic, and policy rules.
AI-centric
Affects AI Agent registration, sponsorships, or behavior standards.
Proposal Category Multipliers
To prevent governance from becoming detached from those most affected, Tythe employs adopter-weighted multipliers:
General
Blue
1.0×
1.0×
Indie-centric
Orange
Indies: 2.0×
Devs/Orgs/Agents: 0.5×
Dev-centric
Red
Devs: 2.0×
Indies/Orgs/Agents: 0.5×
Org-centric
Yellow
Orgs: 2.0×
Indies/Devs/Agents: 0.5×
AI-centric
Green
Agents (via Registrant): 1.5×
Indies/Devs/Orgs: 0.75×
This ensures those most affected by a proposal carry the most voting weight, while maintaining systemic balance.
Anti-Manipulation Measures
Snapshot Voting: DISC and balances locked at vote start
Cooldowns: Limits proposal frequency per TRIS
Public Auditing: All votes and weights published
Verification Checks: Only verified TRIS IDs (ZK-KYH/KYC/KYB/KYA) can vote
Co-Sign Registry: AI Agent votes are linked to their Registrant for auditability
Last updated
Was this helpful?

